Essay about Different Beliefs on Marriage - 698 Words

Due to my sister unplanned pregnancy, my parents forced my sister and her boyfriend to get married. Traditionally in Hmong culture, when a young couple have an unplanned pregnancy, the young couple will then be forced to get married regardless of age and race. It was a must. The guy wouldn’t stand a chance if he denied. The rhetorical sensitivity went wrong with communication because of different culture perspective on marriage. Every culture does not have the same belief on marriage and that’s where the problem was with both cultures. Growing up, my parents were strict on my siblings and I, not just letting us hang outside of school but also dating. They didn’t believed that we kids should date until we finish college and have our†¦show more content†¦He sounded rude and disrespecting. When he said â€Å"that’s not my culture; I am an American and live in America, I don’t have to if I want to.† He should of have respond back saying â€Å"I respect your culture but all culture does not have the same beliefs. We all have different view point of marriage and it is different here in America.† So that my parents would of have a better understanding on where he was coming from. It was wrong for him to say it in that tone because he has to understand that in Hmong culture, don’t respect the elders. It will be a shame because of the disrespecting. How I felt about this was that the boyfriend was wrong to say it in a rude tone but I mean, I do agree with the boyfriend to. Even though my sister is pregnant, they don’t have to marry if they want to because it’s their life’s. On the other hand, it was wrong for my parents to said it directly to the boyfriend too because they know that he wasn’t Hmong and he won’t have the same beliefs. My parents could of said â€Å"so in our culture, we believe that you guys should get marry because that will be the best for you guys† instead of saying â€Å"in Hmong culture, you have to take our daughters hand in marriage because that’s our tradition.† Basically, my parents were forcing the boyfriend to marry my sister and I am pretty sure he didn’t want that just by looking at his facial reaction. The boyfriend reaction to my parents was surprised becauseShow MoreRelatedThe American Concept Of Marriage1140 Words   |  5 PagesThe American concept of marriage foundation has been a foundation for human civilization for centuries. Likewise, forty-one American states revere matrimony laws of Moses between man and woman. However, the concept of marriage for Americans is under rev iew by the United States Supreme Court. Citizens interested in changing the Law of Moses will present their purpose and reason challenging the Federal Defense of Marriage Act. Historical marriage values are questionable to some individuals in AmericanRead MoreLiberty and Justice for All: The Pursuit for Gay Rights Essay1262 Words   |  6 Pagesman and women the idea of marriage has been socially ingrained into the minds of Americans leaving any other possibilities of who love can happen between as unacceptable. These strong societal beliefs are far from the truth yet dictate the ability of homosexuals rights to marry one another. Avoiding defining what marriage entails in the constitution, the issue of whether or not gay people have the right to marry has become a state issue. The conservative idea of marriage is changing as society isRead MorePride and Prejudice Values Juxtaposed Letters to Alice1228 Words   |  5 Pagesboth novels is the ideology of marriage in the sense of whether one should marry for love or financial stability and standing. Both novels are written in an epistolary format providing a different perspective for the reader from the s tandardised third person format. Similarities and differences exist between the changing values of women within the two texts on such issues as moral standards and behaviours or class and social rank however each portrays a slightly different approach and extent with whichRead MoreSociological Analysis On Interfaith Marriage Essay1602 Words   |  7 PagesSociological Analysis on Interfaith Marriage The family issue I will be analyzing is interfaith marriage. Interfaith marriage is simply marriage between two people who belong to or identify with different religious groups. However simple the definition may seem, the reality of interfaith marriage can be far more complex. For most of human history it has been a social taboo to marry outside of one s faith. However, in recent years it has become much more acceptable, even to the point of seemingRead MoreA Comparative Analysis of American and Kenyan Cultures790 Words   |  3 PagesSex and Marriage, Money and Success: A Comparative Analysis of American and Kenyan Cultures In the history of human societies, geographic differences are considered to be a factor that led to different lifestyles, values and beliefs that prevailed and have been the distinct characteristic of specific societies in the world today. From a broader viewpoint, it can be said that Asian cultures differ from North American, European, South American, and African cultures. However, it can also be said thatRead MoreCommunication Is A Cornerstone Of Building A Strong Relationship1247 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Communication is a cornerstone of building a strong relationship (Robinson, 2012). Numerous studies show that marriages that do not have an effective communication between partners easily end up in divorces. Researchers have identified the habits that people have that hinder effective communication in marriages (Kusi Kusi, 2015). These habits are: avoiding the expression of honest feelings and opinions about issues; failing to listen to a partner and being quick to react to the partner’sRead MoreWhy Do People Get Married? What Do Marriages Stand For? Marriage?953 Words   |  4 Pagesdo marriages stand for? Marriage is a union between two people who wish to unite their life together. The reason that people today get married is for love. However, marriage means more than love. A reason why many people get married is that they have found companionship, love, and comfort in another person. The idea of a marriage has different meanings to people. Some marry for money, love or re sources. In modern times, many philosophies have changed throughout the year. In her book marriage, JulietRead MoreGay Marriage Should Not Be Denied Service1457 Words   |  6 Pagesthemselves as Christian businesses and refuse to cater to gay marriages. They do this based on their belief that gay marriage is wrong, and against their faith, and because of this they can’t provide their services or they would be supporting it. In Indiana, a small town pizzeria was asked what their position was on the Religious Restoration Freedom act, and stated that they were a Christian establishment and could not cater to gay marriages. However they would serve gay people and couples in their storeRead MoreEssay on Marriage Equailty for the LGBT Community1554 Words   |  7 Pagesparticularly, marriage equality. Each individual has their own perception on marriage equality, whether it is based on moral basis, or on a humanistic (humane) basis, which is the belief of not denying anyone the right to be who they are, and therefore love who they love. However, as a society, we must examine the facts, as well as ourselves, as we address the debate for marriage equality for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community. The Debate: Morals v. Humanistic Beliefs TheRead MoreAmy And Lin Have Recently Become Friends After Working1059 Words   |  5 PagesTo be honest, I was pretty against legalizing same-sex marriage. LIN: Oh? I was ecstatic when the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in every state. Personally, I viewed it as our country finally taking a step forward in expanding equality. If you don’t mind me asking why are you so against LGBTQ rights and same-sex marriage? AMY: It’s just wrong, don’t you think? It completely goes against my and many other people’s religious beliefs too. LIN: Before we fully go into this argument, I just

Method of Radical Doubt Free Essays

The method of doubt that is used to attain certainty was formulated by famous Western philosopher Rene Descartes (Burnham Fieser). It was initially formulated to be a method for religion, science, and epistemology (Burnham Fieser). He lived in the 16th to 17th century, and created works on mathematics and physics (Burnham Fieser). We will write a custom essay sample on Method of Radical Doubt or any similar topic only for you Order Now His method of radical or hyperbolic doubt was a product of his being a radical skeptic. This position means that Descartes did not readily accept anything as true. Moreover, he did not immediately classify anything as knowledge. Thus, contrary to the inclinations of philosophers and thinkers of his time, he never believed in anything unless they passed his test of indubitability (Burnham Fieser). Descartes vehemently denied the prevailing concepts of his time, as put forward by the Aristotelian, Scholastic, and Medieval traditions (Burnham Fieser). This gave birth to his determination to be a radical skeptic, which for him allowed him to start anew in his quest for a philosophical foundation (Burnham Fieser). However, it is important to note that Descartes’ radical skepticism is different from the position of other skeptics, which is doubting for the sake of doubting. Feature Article Relative Rates:  Free-Radical Bromination Being a radical skeptic, Descartes desperately searched for true knowledge (Burnham Fieser). For him, knowledge is based on truth and indubitability (Burnham Fieser). A certain proposition would only be accepted as knowledge if it were true and does not entertain doubt (Burnham Fieser). For example, one’s knowledge of a table is brought about by his belief that it is true and real. Descartes formulated a criteria of knowledge based on clarity and distinctness, which gives a person confidence in his determination of whether a statement is worthy of being accepted as true knowledge (Burnham Fieser). Descartes’ radical skepticism is characterized by his comprehensive rejection of the reliability of accepting ideas as truth or knowledge (Burnham Fieser). He is known for the wide-ranging premise that truth is not represented by a person’s ideas (Burnham Fieser). For him, ideas cannot be automatically classified as truth (Burnham Fieser). Quite the contrary, ideas obscure a person’s perception of the truth. (Burnham Fieser). Thus Descartes rejected all ideas that are susceptible to doubt. In this connection, he likewise excluded mere wishes or opinions from real knowledge (Burnham Fieser). For him, such dubitable ideas could not serve the purpose of determining the foundation for philosophy or knowledge (Burnham Fieser). Descartes’ method of hyperbolic doubt was explained in detail in his work published in 1641, entitled Meditations on First Philosophy, wherein he discussed issues regarding the existence of God and the distinction between mind and body (Burnham Fieser). In this book, Descartes concluded that there is at least a doubting being whose existence is independent of its body; namely, himself (Burnham Fieser, 2006). Descartes’ method of hyperbolic doubt consists of several stages (Burnham Fieser). First, it involves the identification of a class of knowledge that is unreliable because it is not credible (Burnham Fieser). This class of knowledge refers to sensory information, or those gathered from sensory stimuli (Burnham Fieser). Descartes’ choice of doubting sensory knowledge is based on his stand that sensory knowledge has been known for failing in the past (Burnham Fieser). Furthermore, Descartes claims that there is a distinct possibility that it will still fail in the future. Moreover, he referred to optical illusions, which are sensory knowledge that is based on deception. They make a person believe that his perceptions differ from what truly exists in the world (Burnham Fieser. For Descartes, therefore, sensory knowledge cannot be trusted. Descartes next subjected his own ideas to radical doubt (Burnham Fieser). This he did by imagining that there exists a God who deceives him into thinking his thought, beliefs, and perceptions. (Burnham Fieser, 2006). However, due to Descartes’ strong belief in God, he later replaced the idea of God as the deceiver to avoid disagreeing with his Christian belief, and conjured the idea of a malevolent demon who deceives him (Burnham Fieser). Under this test, Descartes was able to conclude that even his own ideas cannot be trusted because they can still be doubted, since they could have been implanted in his mind by the malevolent demon (Burnham Fieser). Finally, Descartes settled with the conclusion that he exists (Burnham Fieser). This conclusion he reached through mental intuition, because he noticed that there were statements that are presented to his mind with sufficient clarity and distinctness that there is no reason to doubt them (Burnham Fieser). This gave rise to his famous phrase, â€Å"I think therefore I am,† or â€Å"Cogito ergo sum (Burnham Fieser).† This cannot be doubted, because the fact that he doubts shows that there is an existing entity who performs the doubting (Burnham Fieser). If he did not exist in the first place, then there is no being whom the malevolent demon would be deceiving (Burnham Fieser).  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   In sum, Descartes arrived at one conclusion using his method of radical doubt. This conclusion is that it is the indubitable truth that he is a thinking entity that exists (Burnham Fieser). Works Cited Burnham, D. Fieser, J. â€Å"Renà © Descartes (1596-1650).† The Internet Encyclopedia of   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Philosophy. 2006. 1 Apr. 2007 http://www.iep.utm.edu/d/descarte.htm.       How to cite Method of Radical Doubt, Essay examples

Benefits of Learning English free essay sample

The importance of the Internet grows rapidly in all fields of human life, including not only research and education but also marketing and trade as well as entertainment and hobbies. This implies that it becomes more and more important to know how to use Internet services and, as a part of this, to read and write English. Of course, the majority of mankind cannot use the Internet nowadays or in the near future, since they live in countries which lack the necessary economical and technological infrastructure. But the Internet causes polarization in developed countries, too: people are divided into Internet users and Internet illiterates, and as the use of the Internet grows and often replaces traditional methods of communication, the illiterates may find themselves in an awkward position. In general, it is easy to learn to use Internet services. The worst problems of Internet illiteracy are, in addition to lack of economical resources of course, wrong attitudes. We will write a custom essay sample on Benefits of Learning English or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Older people are usually not accustomed to live in a world of continuous and rapid change, and they may not realize the importance of the Internet or the easiness of learning to use it. But although Internet services themselves are, generally speaking, easy to learn and use, you will find yourself isolated on the Internet if you are not familiar with English. This means that knowledge or lack of knowledge of English is one of the most severe factors that cause polarization. Learning to use a new Internet service or user interface may take a few hours, a few days, or even weeks, but it takes years to learn a language so that you can use it in a fluent and self-confident manner. Of course, when you know some English, you can learn more just by using it on the Internet, but at least currently the general tendency among Internet users is to discourage people in their problems with the English language. Incorrect English causes a few flames much more probably than encouragement and friendly advice. In different countries and cultures, English has different positions. There are countries where English is the native language of the majority, there are countries where English is a widely known second language, and there are countries where English has no special position. These differences add to the above-mentioned polarization. Specifically, it is difficult for people in previous colonies of other countries than Great Britain (e. g. France, Spain, the Netherlands) to adapt to the necessity of learning English. Locally, it may be necessary to learn the language of the previous colonial power since it is often an official language and the common language of educated people; globally, English is necessary for living on the Internet. And the more languages you have to learn well, the less time and energy you will have for learning other things.